Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Eklund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1991No. 91-011PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Defendant and appellant, Russell G. Eklund, doing business as Eklund Enterprises, appeals from an order of the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, denying his motion to set aside a default and default judgment. We reverse and vacate the default and default judgment.

The issues raised on appeal are as follows:

1. Did the District Court err in refusing to set aside a default judgment entered by the clerk of court when the plaintiff’s claim was not for a sum certain or for a sum capable of being made certain by computation?

2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lords v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cribb v. Matlock Communications, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Essex Insurance v. Jaycie, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Schmitz v. VasquezMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re the Marriage of WhitingMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Waldher v. Federal Deposit InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Bryden v. LAKESIDE VENTURES, LLC.Montana Supreme Court · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API