Legal Opinion

Fussy v. RTI Surgical

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 6, 2025No. 1:21-cv-01307Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KARIN FUSSY, Case No. 1:21-cv-01307-KES-CDB 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 10 v. DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND 11 RTI SURGICAL, (Doc. 25) 12 Defendants. ORDER STRIKING UNSIGNED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT 13 (Doc. 57) 14 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING 15 CONFERENCE 16 (Doc. 60) 17 14-DAY DEADLINE 18 19 Pending before the undersigned is the motion of Defendant RTI Surgical, Inc. 20 (“Defendant”), to dismiss the first amended complaint of Plaintiff Karin Fussy (“Plaintiff”), filed 21 on May…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API