Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

City of Biddeford Ex Rel. Board of Education v. Biddeford Teachers Ass'n

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 30, 1973Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWernick, Justice

(Agreeing in part and disagreeing in part with the opinion of WEATHERBEE, J.).

I concur in the conclusions reached in Part One of the opinion of Mr. Justice Weatherbee.

I disagree, however, with Part Two and its conclusion that the statutory provisions for binding arbitration must be nullified as an unconstitutional delegation of powers legislative in nature. My opinion is that the legislature has constitutionally utilized arbitration, and judicial interference with the legislative program is unwarranted.

“Unconstitutional delegation of legislative powers” connotes that in a given instance the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API