Legal Opinion

Andy Estates Development Corp. v. Bridal

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1991No. 91AP-274PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peggy Bryant, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Andy Estates Development Corp., appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying plaintiffs motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Civ.R. 60(B).

On May 12, 1989, plaintiff filed the complaint herein against defendantsappellees, Bello Stefano Bridal and Gloria Goodman, asserting that defendants owed plaintiff $10,201.75 under a vehicle lease agreement. On August 27, 1990, plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the complaint without prejudice pursuant to Civ.R. 41(A)(1).

Thereafter, plaintiff apparently attempted to refile the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Matson v. MarksOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Nancy McKinnon Hinsdale v. The Farmers National Bank & Trust Company, Jane M. McKinnonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Hensley v. HenryOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Logsdon v. NicholsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. EMC Mortgage Corp. v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Grossman v. Mathless & Mathless, C.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Logsdon v. NicholsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. J. Richard Gaier Co. v. KesslerOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API