Legal Opinion
PRUD. PROP. & CAS. v. Keystone Ins.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 28, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
286 N.J. Super. 73 (1995)
668 A.2d 92
PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
KEYSTONE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Burlington County.
Decided July 28, 1995.
Debra A. Hart, for plaintiff (Robert A. Auerbach, attorneys).
Steven E. Feld, for defendant (Gercke, Dumser & Feld, P.A., attorneys).
WELLS, A.J.S.C.
This is a declaratory judgment action by Prudential to determine that it is an excess carrier as to certain underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits and that the defendant, Keystone Insurance Company, is the primary carrier.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Royal Ins. Co. v. Rutgers Cas.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Aubrey v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. VassasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Prudential v. TravelersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- Green v. Selective Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Hutnick v. ARI Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Hallion v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Koniecpolski v. Worldwide Insurance GroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Green v. Selective Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.