Legal Opinion

Koniecpolski v. Worldwide Insurance Group

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 1, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

SHEBELL, P.J.AD.

This appeal arises out of a dispute between the defendant insurance carriers, appellant, Worldwide Insurance Group (“Worldwide”) and respondent, Amgro, Inc. (“Amgro”), over which of the two is obligated to provide plaintiff, Marek Koniecpolski, with underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage. The Law Division judge held that only Worldwide was liable to provide UIM coverage. We reverse and hold that Amgro is primarily liable.

On March 31, 1994, plaintiff filed a Complaint in the Law Division against Worldwide and Amgro. He requested the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Royal Ins. Co. v. Rutgers Cas.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  2. Aubrey v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Cook-Sauvageau v. PMA GROUPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  4. Taylor v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  5. American Reliance v. American Cas.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maimone v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  2. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. State Farm InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API