Legal Opinion
Marlow v. Hinman Milking Mach. Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 26, 1947No. Civil Action No. 479PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are copartners doing business in Mankato, Minnesota, as the J. C. Mar-low Co. From about 1912 until January 8, 1947, this copartnership was the distributer of Hinman milking machines and parts in Minnesota and certain other states. On or about January 8, 1947, defendant cancelled the distributing contract for reasons not now material and shortly thereafter hired some of the persons working for plaintiff on the Hinman milking machine business to work for defendant on the same business. Plaintiffs are bringing this action for the alleged breach and wrongful…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- S. Howes Co. v. W. P. Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- R. A. Abel v. Albina Engine & MacHine WorksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- McNeely v. Clayton and Lambert Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Strauss v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Consumers Services, Inc. v. Cleaver-Brooks Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.