Reynolds Metals Co. v. Fmali, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAYNE, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on the motion of FMALI, Inc. (“FMALI”) to. dismiss this action or, alternatively, to transfer it to California. Reynolds Metals Company (“Reynolds”) complains that FMALI has failed to pay for certain packaging as contractually obligated, and it asserts that FMALI is subject to personal jurisdiction in Virginia. FMALI is a family-owned California corporation with its principal place of business in California; and Reynolds is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Virginia.
The parties’ contractual…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Byerson v. Equifax Information Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Cognitronics Imaging Systems, Inc. v. Recognition Research Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- D'ADDARIO v. GellerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- BHP International Investment, Inc. v. Online Exchange, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Ion Beam Applications S.A. v. Titan Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.