Legal Opinion

Denson v. Fowler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 29, 1916No. 6250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from County Court, McCurtain County; E. E. Cochran, Judge. Action by R. C. Denson and others against D. A. Fowler and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring'error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

The only assignments of error argued in the brief of plaintiffs in error are that the court erred in giving to the jury instructions Nos. 1 and 2. Upon an examination of the record we find that the court gave the jury five instructions. At the'bottom of the instructions given, as shown in the record, appears the following: “Plaintiffs except to all of the instructions except the last two.” It has been. repeatedly held in this court that: “Where proper exceptions have not been taken and preserved to any particular instruction, and the objection presented to the trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glaser v. GlaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Eisminger v. BemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Shelby v. ShanerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Cummings v. LobsitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Taylor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alva Roller Mills v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. National Bank of Hastings v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Boorigie Bros. v. Quinn-Barry Tea & Coffee Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Salter v. LarisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API