Legal Opinion
People v. Quadrozzi
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*262OPINION OF THE COUHT
Carolyn E. Demarest, J.
The instant indictment is unusual in that the Kings County District Attorney has undertaken, pursuant to ECL 71-0403, to prosecute defendant concrete manufacturer, whose facility is located on the banks of Newtown Creek in Queens County, for discharging “matter” into the creek and for failing to comply with various permit requirements of the ECL. (Defendant Quadrozzi is vice-president of the corporate defendant and acted as the corporation’s chief environmental officer in this matter.) Upon an initial superficial review of the grand jury minutes,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. ClaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- People v. LancasterNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re the Claim of GruberNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Cimo v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. CurdgelNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. QuadrozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008