Legal Opinion
Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County, Excise Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 17, 1939No. 29210PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, V. C. J.
The Court of Tax Review dismissed the protest for lack of jurisdiction, protestants appeal.
The petition in error set out four grounds of protest, numbered 19, 20, 21, and 22; all grounds are for the same reason, therefore, we will treat them as one.
The protestant contends that the Court of Tax Review erred when it dismissed all four grounds for lack of jurisdiction, his protest being in substance that the rate of lexy fixed by excise board to pay obligations of four separate school districts which had been annexed to another district, said obligations having been incurred…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Protest of First Nat. Bank of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Protest of Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. v. Excise Board of Bryan CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Ingram v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. Comanche CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Public Service Co. v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Public Service Co. v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943