In re Hollis
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
LPER CURIAM.*
This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from the filing of two counts of formal charges by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Anthony Hollis, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Louisiana. The charges alleged respondent failed to provide competent and diligent representation, failed to communicate with clients, failed to account for or return unearned fees, failed to cooperate in a disciplinary investigation and failed to comply with a subpoena issued by a tribunal, in violation of Rules 1.3, 1.4,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cited by9 opinions
- In re TrichelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- In Re BergeronSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- In re SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- In re BonnetteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- In re WhiteheadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.