Legal Opinion

In re Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 27, 2000No. 00-B-2627PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

This attorney disciplinary proceeding arises from eight counts of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against Willie Fred Smith, a attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently ineligible.1

UNDERLYING FACTS

In August of 1997, Robert Purifoy, an Arkansas resident, retained respondent to institute proceedings in connection with the succession of Mr. Purifoy’s father. Mr. Purifoy gave respondent $960 as a retainer and for court costs, as well as for payment of back taxes on a large tract of immovable property owned by…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. In re JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. In re HollisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. In re DurusauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. In Re ArbourSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. In re SchnyderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  4. In re ThorntonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. In re WhiteheadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API