Legal Opinion

In the Matter of William Young

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2011No. 49S00-1007-JD-374PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

This matter comes before the Court as a result of a judicial disciplinary action brought by the Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications (“Commission”) against the Respondent herein, William E. Young, Judge of the Marion Superior Court. Article 7, Section 4 of the Indiana Constitution and Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 25 give the Indiana Supreme Court original jurisdiction over this matter.

Subsequent to the filing of formal charges by the Commission, the Respondent and the Commission jointly tendered a “Statement of Circumstances and Conditional…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. HOLLINSWORTH v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In Re KoetheIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. An Inquiry Concerning the Honorable Ruth Neely, Municipal Court Judge and Circuit Court Magistrate, Ninth Judicial District, Pinedale, Sublette County, WyomingJudge Ruth Neely v. Wyoming Commission On Judicial Conduct and Ethics.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  2. In Re HarkinIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In the Matter of the Honorable Robert W. Freese, Judge of the Hendricks Superior Court 1Indiana Supreme Court · 2019
  4. An Inquiry Concerning the Honorable Ruth Neely, Municipal Court Judge and Circuit Court Magistrate, Ninth Judicial District, Pinedale, Sublette County, WyomingJudge Ruth Neely v. Wyoming Commission On Judicial Conduct and Ethics.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  5. In the Matter of James Steven CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API