Legal Opinion

In Re Harkin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2011No. 45S00-1106-JD-390PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

This matter comes before the Court as a result of a judicial disciplinary action brought by the Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications (“Commission”) against the Respondent, Jeffrey A. Harkin, Judge of the Hammond City Court. Article 7 Section 4 of the Indiana Constitution and Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 25 give the Indiana Supreme Court original jurisdiction over this matter.

Subsequent to the Commission’s filing of formal charges, the parties jointly tendered a “Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline,” which the Court…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In the Matter of William YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. An Inquiry Concerning the Honorable Ruth Neely, Municipal Court Judge and Circuit Court Magistrate, Ninth Judicial District, Pinedale, Sublette County, WyomingJudge Ruth Neely v. Wyoming Commission On Judicial Conduct and Ethics.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  2. An Inquiry Concerning the Honorable Ruth Neely, Municipal Court Judge and Circuit Court Magistrate, Ninth Judicial District, Pinedale, Sublette County, WyomingJudge Ruth Neely v. Wyoming Commission On Judicial Conduct and Ethics.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In the Matter of the Honorable Geoff L. Robison, Judge of the New Haven City CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
  4. The Honorable Kimberly J. Brown, Judge of the Marion Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. The Honorable Kimberly J. Brown, Judge of the Marion Superior CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API