Legal Opinion

Corl v. Kacmar

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1990No. 1316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

David Kacmar appeals from the trial court’s order finding him to be the father of appellee’s daughter and imposing support obligations upon him. Appellant provides two arguments on appeal: that the jury’s finding of paternity was against the weight of the evidence, and that the trial court erred in refusing to admit notes of prior testimony by a witness who was unavailable for trial. We find no error; accordingly, we affirm.

The child in question was born in November 1981. According to appellee’s testimony, appellee was dating Michael Andronok in and around February 1981. She…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Johnson v. PeakeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Katz v. MontagueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania State Police v. 139 Horseshoe Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Onyshko, M. v. National Collegiate AthleticSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API