Corl v. Kacmar
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
David Kacmar appeals from the trial court’s order finding him to be the father of appellee’s daughter and imposing support obligations upon him. Appellant provides two arguments on appeal: that the jury’s finding of paternity was against the weight of the evidence, and that the trial court erred in refusing to admit notes of prior testimony by a witness who was unavailable for trial. We find no error; accordingly, we affirm.
The child in question was born in November 1981. According to appellee’s testimony, appellee was dating Michael Andronok in and around February 1981. She…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Johnson v. PeakeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Katz v. MontagueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pennsylvania State Police v. 139 Horseshoe Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Onyshko, M. v. National Collegiate AthleticSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021