Legal Opinion

Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company v. 05 Petete, Inc. d/b/a Euphoria Vive La Diferencia a/k/a Euphoria

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 29, 2026No. 2:26-cv-01891Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLEAR BLUE SPECIALTY : CIVIL ACTION INSURANCE COMPANY : : v. : : 05 PETETE, INC. d/b/a : NO. 26-1891 EUPHORIA VIVE LA DIFERENCIA : a/k/a EUPHORIA : MEMORANDUM Bartle, J. July 29, 2026 Plaintiff Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company (“Clear Blue”) seeks a declaration that it has no obligation to provide insurance coverage and thus no duty to defend or indemnify its insured, 05 Petete, Inc. (“Euphoria”), which is a defendant in an underlying action pending in this court captioned Sampedro v. Euphoria One, Inc., Civil…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Alan Schmidt v. John SkolasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  3. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Allan J. Jablonski v. Pan American World Airways, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API