Legal Opinion
Hartley v. Williamson
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 20, 2000No. 94,545PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STUBBLEFIELD, J.
¶ 1 This is an appeal from summary judgment granted to a court-appointed psychologist in a multi-theory action for damages brought by a mother and daughter counseled by the psychologist. The appeal has been assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 1.36, 12 O.S. Supp. 1999, ch. 15, app. 1. Based on review of the record on appeal and applicable law, we affirm.
¶2 This action arises from child custody proceedings between the divorced couple, Kim Eugene Hartley (Father) and Kim Allyson Hartley (Mother). The couple was divorced in 1990 with Mother…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Kirschstein v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Kirkpatrick v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Oliver v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Knight v. Mooring Capital Fund, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Berman v. Laboratory Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Simonson v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Levings v. Dimont & Associates, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2022
- Modoc Nation v. ShahDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.