Gilbert Properties, Inc. v. Millstein
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: Plaintiff client’s cause of action against defendant attorney for malpractice accrued, at the latest, when the áttorney-cliént relationship between them ended in 1966. (Cf., e.g., Borgia v. City of New York, 12 N Y 2d 151, 155; Siegel v. Kranis, 29 A D 2d 477, 480; see, also, Note, 18 ALR 3d 985 et seq.) Consequently, since the plaintiff’s suit for malpractice was commenced in 1970, the determination of the Appellate Division that the-plaintiff’s action was time-barred by the three-year period of limitations (CPLR 203; CPLR 214,…
2Cited by35 opinions
- Leon v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Leon v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.