Legal Opinion

Gilbert Properties, Inc. v. Millstein

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1973PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: Plaintiff client’s cause of action against defendant attorney for malpractice accrued, at the latest, when the áttorney-cliént relationship between them ended in 1966. (Cf., e.g., Borgia v. City of New York, 12 N Y 2d 151, 155; Siegel v. Kranis, 29 A D 2d 477, 480; see, also, Note, 18 ALR 3d 985 et seq.) Consequently, since the plaintiff’s suit for malpractice was commenced in 1970, the determination of the Appellate Division that the-plaintiff’s action was time-barred by the three-year period of limitations (CPLR 203; CPLR 214,…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. Leon v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Leon v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Santulli v. Englert, Reilly & McHugh, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API