Legal Opinion

Clardy v. Kansas City Public Service Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for personal injuries and recovered judgment. Defendant timely filed motion for new trial which was sustained "on account of errors in instruction 1." Plaintiff has appealed.

It is disclosed by the record that plaintiff's statement of the allegations of the petition is correct, and we therefore adopt pertinent parts thereof which read:

"That 8th street running east and west and Walnut street running north and south were open, public and much traveled streets within Kansas City, Missouri; that the respondent, Kansas City Public Service Company owned,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davidson v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Midway National Bank & Trust Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  3. Long v. Lackawanna Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Guthrie v. GillespieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. Flint v. SebastianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harry and Florence Kelley v. Natl. Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Service Construction Company v. NicholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Gover v. ClevelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Petty v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  5. Drake Ex Rel. Imes v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API