Legal Opinion

Pinkston v. Connor

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 1983No. 8222SC298PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Several of defendant’s assignments of error, the only ones requiring discussion, raise or relate to the question whether the trial judge erred in refusing to submit issues as to the contributory negligence of the plaintiff and the concurring negligence of the Town of Mooresville. Essentially, it is just one question, since the only basis upon which the Town might have been at fault, under the circumstances recorded, was through the acts or omissions of the plaintiff, who was Morrow’s superior and responsible for getting the tree out of the street and deciding how best to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atkins v. MoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Northwestern Distributors, Inc. v. N. C. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Poovey v. International Sugar Feed No. Two Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Kellogg v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Greene v. MeredithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tyburski v. StewartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. McCullough v. Amoco Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API