Landell v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 202, Jan. T., 1895, by plaintiffs, from decree of C. P. Phila. Co., Sept. T., 1895, No. 551, on bill in equity. Petition on the part of appellees for reargument. The facts appear in Landell v. Hamilton, 175 Pa. 827.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Dean,
At the first hearing in this case, both in oral argument and on the paper-books, the case turned on but a single question, viz, whether the restriction as to building placed by the original grantor on lot No. 1208, in favor of lots 1206 and 1210, was *24perpetual, or whether it ended with the existence of the house then upon the middle lot. After a careful consideration, we decided the restriction was continuing, and directed that an injunction issue in conformity to the prayer of the petitioner. The effect of this was to restrain defendants from putting any building…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Landell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
3Cited by13 opinions
- Phillips v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Johnson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- DeBlasiis v. Bartell & OlivetoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Mishkin v. Temple Beth ElSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Phillips v. DunseithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.