Legal Opinion
Huntington National Bank v. Heritage Investment Group
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 5, 1983No. 1245PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.
The Huntington National Bank (“Huntington”) filed a complaint against Heritage Investment Group (“Heritage”), Thomas Ruble, Ruth Ruble, Kenneth Fordenwalt and Marilyn Fordenwalt. Huntington sought money judgments upon certain cognovit notes and the foreclosure of mortgages held on two parcels of land. By an amended complaint, Cuyahoga Savings Association and Pacific Indemnify Co. were named as defendants based upon their respective claims of interest in the property. The cognovit judgment was taken on April 26, 1982.
Heritage filed a motion under Civ. R. 60(B)(5) to vacate the cognovit…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Ireland v. CheneyOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Miles v. N. J. Motors, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sallady v. WebbOhio Circuit Courts · 1887
3Cited by9 opinions
- National City Bank v. AbdallaOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Murello Construction Co. v. Citizens Home Savings Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Clark v. Village of WoodmereOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- First National Bank v. Miami UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re Estate of CullenOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.