Legal Opinion

Saling v. Saling

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 18, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bentley, V. C.

This is a bill for partition, with an answer and counterclaim.

The complainant is a sister of the defendant, and the remaining defendant, being the latter’s wife, is a mere, formal party, and no account of her will be taken in the language of this opinion.

In or about 1912, Magdalene E. Saling, the mother of the parties to this suit, died seized of three tracts of lands, designated in the pleadings as tracts A, B and C. She died intestate and, in consequence, the parcels of real estate mentioned descended to the parties as tenants in common. As to this there is no dispute, and it…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tennenberger v. SozioNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. Sorg v. TowerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  3. West Jersey Trust Co. v. HaydayNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  4. Farmers' National Bank, Sussex v. SalmonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API