Potter v. Lumsden
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, who filed the following opinion: “Complainant was the owner of land in Andover, in this .state, upon which a brick dwelling, tenant-houses and several bams are erected, the whole being known ag the ‘Pequest Stud Farm,’ which complainant had operated for several years for breeding horses.
Read the full summary
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, who filed the following opinion: “Complainant was the owner of land in Andover, in this .state, upon which a brick dwelling, tenant-houses and several bams are erected, the whole being known ag the ‘Pequest Stud Farm,’ which complainant had operated for several years for breeding horses. Defendant was seeking to purchase a stud farm and complainant opened negotiations with him for the sale of the land and premises in question. After several meetings between them, complainant agreed to sell and defendant…
1Per curiam
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.
*484For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk — 13. For reversal — None.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Casriel v. KingNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Gaub v. Nassau Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Lampros v. TenoreNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Picconi v. CarlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Brown v. GreenSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 1930