Legal Opinion
Picconi v. Carlin
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 22, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
40 N.J. Super. 393 (1956)
123 A.2d 87
SAM PICCONI, AND LORETTA PICCONI, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
FRANCIS X. CARLIN, AND ADELAIDE M. CARLIN, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided May 22, 1956.
Mr. Boris Seeber argued the cause for plaintiffs (Mr. Benjamin Yanowsky, attorney).
Mr. Harry Sears argued the cause for defendants (Messrs. Young & Sears, attorneys).
MINTZ, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Plaintiffs in this action seek a return of their deposit under a contract for the sale of realty, contending that the defendants are unable to convey a marketable title as…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Casriel v. KingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Myers v. Moore-Kile Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- James Smith Woolen Machine Co. v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
- Baldwin v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Van Riper v. WickershamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baptist Church in Great Valley v. UrquhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Rolleston v. Sea Island Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985