Eliel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In this action, plaintiffs sought to recover damages for breach of an employment contract, age and sex discrimination, and loss of consortium. The circuit court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(3), holding that there was no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that defendants were entitled to prevail as a matter of law. Plaintiffs appeal as of right.
In Toussaint v Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, 408 Mich 579, 598; 292 NW2d 880 (1980), the Court said:
"We hold that
"1) a provision of an employment contract providing that an employee shall…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Civil Rights Commission v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Bouwman v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Rosati v. HaranDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Jones v. SlaughterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by23 opinions
- Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Chavez v. Manville Products Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Barnell v. Taubman Co, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Timko v. Oakwood Custom Coating, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Stevens v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.