Horn v. Witherspoon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew,
Appellant petitioned in the court below for a rule to open and let appellant in to an alleged defense to a judgment entered by confession on a mortgage bond. From the order dismissing the petition and refusing the rule this appeal was taken.
We think the court has not abused its discretion. A petition to open a judgment by confession is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court (Sferra v. Urling, 324 Pa. 344; George v. George, 318 Pa. 203; Kaier Company v. O’Brien, 202 Pa. 153) and is essentially an equitable proceeding ruled by the principles of equity:…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bank v. FulmorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Charles D. Kaier Co. v. O'brienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Sferra v. UrlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- George v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Hilliard v. Allegheny Geometrical Wood Carving Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. DaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Downes v. HODINSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Berkowitz v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Carlson v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Britton v. Continental Mining & Smelting Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.