Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Cuyler

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 81-4309Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.

This is a petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate in accordance with Local Rule 7 of this court. The magistrate issued a report and recommended that the petition be denied without prejudice on the ground that the Relator had not exhausted his claims in state court. The Commonwealth, although it agrees with the magistrate’s recommendation that the Relator has not exhausted his claims in state court, has filed objections to the report.

*396Local Rule 7(IV)(b) provides…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Joseph Zicarelli v. Albert D. Gray, Jr., Superintendent, New Jersey State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API