Legal Opinion

State ex rel. The Timken Co. v. Hammer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2002No. 2000-2292PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 121.] THE STATE EX REL. THE TIMKEN COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. HAMMER ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Timken Co. v. Hammer,

2002-Ohio-1754.] Workers’ compensation—Violation of a specific safety requirement—Applicability of Ohio Adm.Code 4121:1-5-13(F)(1)(d) to straddle truck used to carry loads of pipe, lumber, and other long materials. (No. 2000-2292—Submitted January 29, 2002—Decided May 1, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-905. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶1} In the early…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Go-Jo Industries v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Go-Jo Industries v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Timken Co. v. HammerOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Precision Steel Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API