Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. v. Askewe
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Justice.
Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation appeals from the granting of a temporary injunction that prevents them from pursuing an injunction in a Canadian court. The sole question on appeal in this case, as in a previous appeal, 1 is whether the district court abused its discretion by enjoining the appellant from pursuing an injunction in a foreign court which would prevent the ap-pellees from pursuing their Texas action. As before, we are again dealing with an anti-anti-suit proceeding. Because of the substantial identity between the facts involved in both appeals, we will provide…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- W. S. Kirkpatrick & Co. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Iranian Muslim Organization v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Gregory Carl Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
- Jacob Matthew Kiffe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.