Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. v. Askewe

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1992No. 6-91-080-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation appeals from the granting of a temporary injunction that prevents them from pursuing an injunction in a Canadian court. The sole question on appeal in this case, as in a previous appeal, 1 is whether the district court abused its discretion by enjoining the appellant from pursuing an injunction in a foreign court which would prevent the ap-pellees from pursuing their Texas action. As before, we are again dealing with an anti-anti-suit proceeding. Because of the substantial identity between the facts involved in both appeals, we will provide…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. W. S. Kirkpatrick & Co. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Iranian Muslim Organization v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  3. Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  4. Gregory Carl Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  5. Jacob Matthew Kiffe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API