Kelly v. Wilson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Construing the partition deed of September, 1888, referred to in the statement above, the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals held, when the cause was before it, that the effect of the instrument was to pass the title to the land in controversy to Mrs. Kate Kelly, and that plaintiff in error, owning her title, was entitled to recover all of that land, "except (quoting) such portion or portions thereof as defendants (defendants in error here) may show title to under their plea of limitation." Plaintiff in error insists that said holding of said court was conclusive of the contention of defendants…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Green v. PriddyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Amsler v. CavittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Corcanges v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Midland Nat. Bank v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Berryhill v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Overson v. CowleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- McNeely v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955