Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 21, 1926No. 3215PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Construing the partition deed of September, 1888, referred to in the statement above, the Galveston Court of Civil Appeals held, when the cause was before it, that the effect of the instrument was to pass the title to the land in controversy to Mrs. Kate Kelly, and that plaintiff in error, owning her title, was entitled to recover all of that land, "except (quoting) such portion or portions thereof as defendants (defendants in error here) may show title to under their plea of limitation." Plaintiff in error insists that said holding of said court was conclusive of the contention of defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. PriddyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Amsler v. CavittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Corcanges v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Midland Nat. Bank v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berryhill v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Overson v. CowleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  3. McNeely v. Southwestern Settlement & Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API