Legal Opinion
Kreuscher v. Roth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 9, 1922No. 22,628PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibbll, J.
This is an action in equity to have the plaintiffs adjudged the owners of certain property in St. Paul, subject to an equitable mortgage in favor of the defendant Charles H. Roth. The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment that they have no interest and that the defendant Roth is the owner.
The property was at one time owned by Rose Kreuscher, the mother of the plaintiffs, then a widow. Afterwards she married Emil J. Peyer. The property was their homestead. On February 1, 1914, they made a mortgage upon it. Mrs. Peyer died intestate on March 31, 1918. The plaintiffs and Peyer were her only heirs.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Plympton v. Boston DispensaryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Tindall v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- King v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Whitney v. SalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Bowen v. BroganMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hayward v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Fuller v. DennistounSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Browning v. BrowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Turner v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.