Legal Opinion

Harris v. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 10, 1952No. 10514_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Circuit Judge.

William A. Harris was injured while employed as a switchman by the Texas and Pacific Railway Company. Upon application made to the Railroad Retirement Board (hereinafter called Board) Harris was awarded benefits based upon total and permanent disability. Thereafter he brought suit against the railway company under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In that action he caused a subpoena duces tecum to be issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
  5. Alejandrino v. QuezonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Oleta O'COnnOr Yates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  2. Morelli v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. New Jersey Zinc Co. v. Local 890 of International Union of MineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hawaii Public Employment Relations Board v. United Public Workers, Local 646Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People's Housing Development Corp. v. City of PoughkeepsieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API