Legal Opinion
Oleta O'COnnOr Yates v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 26, 1955No. 16-10532PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
Oleta O’Connor Yates was one of those indicted and on trial as a defendant on a charge of conspiracy to violate the Smith Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2385. After the close of the government case, all of the defendants rested except four, of whom Mrs. Yates was one. She was the only defendant there who testified. Yates v. United States, 9 Cir., 225 F.2d 146. Upon cross-examination she refused to answer any of four questions. Upon direction of the court to respond, she still refused. Thereupon, the trial judge signed a certificate with four specifications setting up the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Curtis B. Danning, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Fenton, Lavine & Co., a Partnership v. Beau Berlinski LavineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.