Legal Opinion

Arteaga v. Cinram-Technicolor

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided January 28, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00349Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION WENDY ARTEAGA, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:19-cv-00349 v. Judge Eli J. Richardson Magistrate Judge Alistair E. Newbern CINRAM-TECHNICOLOR, et al., Defendants. To: The Honorable Eli J. Richardson, District Judge REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This civil rights action stems from pro se and in forma pauperis Plaintiff Wendy Arteaga’s employment with Defendant Technicolor Home Entertainment Services Southeast, LLC (Technicolor). 1 (Doc. No. 1.) Arteaga alleges that Technicolor and Defendant Alliance HR, Inc. (Alliance), the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API