Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Marion Bank & Trust Co.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided July 8, 2014No. 2:11-cv-1369-LSCPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1292ORDER

L. SCOTT COOGLER, District Judge.

In this action, Plaintiffs Ragan Livingston (“Ragan”) and her husband Mitch Livingston assert claims against Marion Bank and Trust Co. and its president, Conrad Taylor (“Defendants”), alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and Alabama state law. The Magistrate Judge entered a report and recommendation recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 44) be granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. 56.) No objections were filed. The Court has considered the entire file in this…

2Cases cited143 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Batayias v. The Mechanical Shop, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2020
  2. Lee Anthony Branch v. Rodney HerringDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2026
  3. Lutz v. LexJax, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
  4. Madrid v. Homeland Security Solutions Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API