Guss v. SYDNEY REALTY CORPORATION
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Snead, J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.'
Pursuant to § 8-836, Code 1950, as amended, Sydney Realty Corporation filed a motion for judgment against Geneva C. Guss and her husband, James C. Guss, to have ascertained and designated by the court the true boundary line between the coterminous properties of the litigants. The motion for judgment described the land involved and the boundary line the corporation sought to establish. In their answer filed, the Gusses denied that the correct line was that claimed by the corporation and described the line which they contended was correct. A trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rorer Iron Co. v. TroutSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- Snyder v. GrandstaffSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
- Aragon Coffee Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Bossieux v. JuliusSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- Richmond Cedar Works v. WestSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duty v. DutySupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Cygnus Newport-Phase 1B, LLC v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
- Richardson v. AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. CrowtherPittsylvania County Circuit Court · 2009