Legal Opinion

Richardson v. AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 16, 2004No. Record 030390PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

In this appeal, we consider whether the chancellor erred in ruling that certain mortgagees were entitled to protections afforded third parties under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act, as codified in Kentucky and Virginia (the Act). Kentucky Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 385.012 through 385.252 and Virginia Code §§ 31-37 through -59. This issue arose from the mortgagees’ asserted right to enforce liens secured by real property that a custodian had transferred from a custodial estate to herself by a quitclaim deed. We also consider whether the chancellor erred in holding that the quitclaim deed was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Woods v. MendezSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  2. Mozley v. Prestwould Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  3. Chavis v. GibbsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  4. Tauber v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. KilgoreSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  5. Allen v. GreenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duty v. DutySupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  2. In Re ShaversUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2009
  3. Cruickshanks v. Permberton Oaks Townhouse Ass'n (In re Cruickshank)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
  4. Cruickshanks v. Permberton Oaks Townhouse Ass'n (In re Cruickshanks)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. CrowtherPittsylvania County Circuit Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API