Legal Opinion

Hollenbeck v. City of Marshalltown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court. This is an action to recover for a personal injury which, it is alleged, was received by plaintiff by reason of a fall upon a defective sidewalk. There was a trial by jury, and a ver-diet and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

I. The sidewalk where the injury was re*22ceived was upon one of tbe principal streets of the city. If 1. poembk specfaf'vor- ' diet: avoided. by new trial, was constructed by placing two stringers lengthwise of the street, with two inch planks nailed . across the stringers. Ike walk was some tour teet in width. On the evening of the twenty-first of April, 1880, and after night-fall, the plaintiff and another woman were going along the walk, and the other woman stepped upon a loose plank in the. walk and tipped it up, and the plaintiff came in contact with the plank, or stepped into the opening,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dively v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Buttman v. ChristySupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Bender v. Incorporated Town of MindenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Johnson v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. McElfresh v. McElfreshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API