Johnson v. City of Waterloo
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Blach Llawle District Court. — Hon. Charles E. Bansier, Judge. Action for severance of territory from tbe corporate limits of the city of Waterloo resulted in judgment as prayed. The defendant appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
*671*' challenge: interest. *670— -The jury decided that the territory of two *671hundred and eighty acres described in the petition should be severed from the city of Waterloo, and in the appeal from judgment to that effect but three errors are assigned. As the land was used for agricultural purposes, it was not subject to assessment for taxation for municipal expenses. On voir dire, four members of the panel answered that they were resident taxpayers of the defendant city and were excused upon challenge of plaintiff for this reason: Had the issue been such that its determination might have resulted in…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Woolfolk v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Hildreth v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Kendall v. City of AlbiaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Davenport Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Summy v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- State of Iowa v. Jerin Douglas MootzSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Beyer v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Wagner v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Alber v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.