Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Garson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2006Published

1Dissent

*619G.B. Smith, J. (dissenting in part).

The primary issue here is whether the Rules of Judicial Conduct may be used as criminal statutes to prosecute a judge. I agree with the trial court and the Appellate Division that the Rules are not criminal statutes. Thus, the evidence before the grand jury was legally insufficient to sustain 8 of the 11 charges in the consolidated indictments (Nos. 3515/2003 and 5332/2003).

Facts

The People assert that there was an ongoing improper attorney-judge relationship between Paul Siminovsky and defendant over a period of three years, including lunches, drinks, money…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Sutka v. ConnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API