People v. Garson
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
*619G.B. Smith, J. (dissenting in part).
The primary issue here is whether the Rules of Judicial Conduct may be used as criminal statutes to prosecute a judge. I agree with the trial court and the Appellate Division that the Rules are not criminal statutes. Thus, the evidence before the grand jury was legally insufficient to sustain 8 of the 11 charges in the consolidated indictments (Nos. 3515/2003 and 5332/2003).
Facts
The People assert that there was an ongoing improper attorney-judge relationship between Paul Siminovsky and defendant over a period of three years, including lunches, drinks, money…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Sutka v. ConnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.