Legal Opinion

Taco Bell Corp. v. United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1991No. 10A04-8911-CV-523PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

Taco Bell Corporation appeals the trial court's denial of its motion to vacate a default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff-appellee United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau) The sole issue for our review is whether Farm Bureau provided Taco Bell with adequate notice to give the trial court jurisdiction over Taco Bell. We hold that it did and therefore affirm.

FACTS

The facts are not in dispute. Gerald Elliott, an employee of Taco Bell's Clarks-ville restaurant, was involved in an auto accident with Inge Velasquez. Mrs. Velasquez's husband was the named insured…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Radiotelephone Co. of Indiana v. FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Marriage of Bays v. BaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Overhauser v. FowlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Volunteers of America v. Premier Auto Acceptance Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. State, Department of Natural Resources v. Van KeppelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Moore v. Terre Haute First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. Carmel Healthcare Management, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Sanders v. CarsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API