Legal Opinion

Van Hoesen v. Hogan

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1980Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Roger J. Miner, J.

Defendant Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance Company (Millers) moves for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the cause of action pleaded against it is barred by a contractual time limitation. Defendant Harold Holt Associates, Inc. (Holt), cross-moves for dismissal of the cause of action and all cross claims pleaded against it on the same ground and on the further ground that no cause of action is stated against this defendant.

A summons with notice was served upon. Millers on February 6, 1980. In the sixth cause of action pleaded in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John J. Kassner & Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Kaufman v. Republic InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. K & T Development Co. v. Quincey Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API