Legal Opinion
City of Minot v. Freelander
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1988No. Civ. 870302PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Genevieve Freelander appealed from a judgment ordering the demolition of her home because it was determined to be a public and private nuisance. We affirm.
*557This is the third time that this case has been before this court. In City of Minot v. Freelander, 368 N.W.2d 514 (N.D.1985) [Freelander I], we affirmed the trial court’s judgment that Freelander’s house in Minot was a public and private nuisance because of “its filthy, unsanitary, and odorous condition” and ordering the house to be demolished. That judgment was based upon certain structural deficiencies in Free-lander’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Tom Beuchler Construction, Inc. v. City of WillistonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Busch v. City of AugustaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983
- City of Rapid City v. BolandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tioga Public School District 15 of Williams County, State of North Dakota v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Starzenski v. City of ElkhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Mountrail County v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Kartch v. EOG Resources, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2012
- Blanchard v. City of RalstonNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.