Legal Opinion
State v. Swink
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided September 21, 2000No. 990501-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENCH, Judge:
T1 Appellant Brian Swink challenges his conviction for attempted theft. He claims that his Fifth Amendment rights were violated when the trial court refused to suppress statements he made to a counselor at a secure youth facility without first being advised of the right against self-incrimination. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
12 Swink was incarcerated at Decker Lake, a secure youth facility, on an unrelated offense and was assigned to the Genesis work program. In early January 1999, Swink and another…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Enrique Ortiz Cervantes v. Bill Walker, Superintendent, Banning Road CampCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Robert James RitchieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Albrecht v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002