State v. Hopkins
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSON, Justice:
¶ 1 Floyd Hopkins appeals his convictions for (1) operating a clandestine methamphetamine laboratory; (2) possession of metham phetamine with intent to distribute; (3) possession of a controlled substance precursor; and (4) possession of drug paraphernalia. Hopkins asserts reversible error due to ineffective assistance of counsel, insufficiency of the evidence, and prosecutorial misconduct. He also contends the trial court illegally imposed a separate sentence for the controlled substance precursor count. The State defends the verdict on three of the counts but concedes that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. FontanaUtah Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BoydUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. PritchettUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GriffinUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. GallegosUtah Supreme Court · 2020
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.