Legal Opinion
Kronengold v. Kronengold
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided May 20, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*455OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered May 29, 1991 reversed, with $10 costs, defendant Rivka Kronengold’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against her is denied and the complaint reinstated.
In this negligence action for personal injuries, the infant plaintiff, then 2Vz years old, was involved in a pedestrian accident. The infant plaintiff was struck and injured by a southbound motor vehicle while being held in his mother’s arms as she attempted to cross an intersection at West 106 Street and Broadway, allegedly against a red light. The accident occurred on March 22, 1986,…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Holodook v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Gelbman v. GelbmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Rotz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Zikely v. ZikelyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Zikely v. ZikelyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Kronengold v. KronengoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993