Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Moseley

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1920No. 127-3011PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

KITTRELD, J.

The litigation in this case arose over the opening of a road. Defendant in error Bradford owned and lived on a survey of 160 acres in Palo Pinto county which ■lies wholly within and is entirely surrounded by a ranch of 3,000 acres. Mrs. Moseley, one of the defendants in error,, owns .a life estate in the ranch, and the children of her husband and herself, eight in number, own the fee-simple title, subject to the life estate. For the sake of brevity, we will condense this statement, by setting forth only enough of the facts revealed by the pleadings, evidence,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cooper v. NewellSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Gano v. Palo Pinto CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Parker v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Bankhead v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  5. Williams v. BallTexas Supreme Court · 1879

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Williams v. CastlemanTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Tarrant County v. ShannonTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dancy v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Turner v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API