Legal Opinion
P.P. C.I.R.R. Co. v. . C.I. B.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 11, 1894PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The parties to this action entered into a contract June 1, 1882, and the plaintiff seeks to compel its specific performance.
The Special Term rendered judgment for plaintiff; the General Term reversed the judgment, and the plaintiff comes here under the usual stipulation in case of affirmance.
The reversal was for error, both of law and fact, and the failure to insert a certificate that the case contains all the evidence having been cured by the amendment of the return by the Supreme Court, we are called upon to review the facts as well as the law.
At the time of making the contract the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Franklin Telegraph Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hudson River Telephone Co. v. Watervliet Turnpike & Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Standard Fashion Co. v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Taylor v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Great Lakes & St. Lawrence Transp. Co. v. Scranton Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.